What to do when an AI detector flags you

UnAIMyText publishes more testing methodology than most detector vendors do. Across all 41 pages of its site, Pangram appears zero times.

SuperHumanizer answered this itself, twice, in its own subreddit: Pangram was flagging its output, and it does not consider Pangram a common detector.

Clarity Bubble sells itself as the only humanizer that passes all detectors. Its Terms of Service say it does not warrant passing any detector, and Pangram is named nowhere on the site.

Ryne AI claims 100% against Turnitin and 99.8% against GPTZero, names ten detectors, and reviews six more on its blog. Pangram is in none of it. No test exists.

Rephrasy’s 98% Pangram claim appears 3 times in page metadata and zero times on the visible page. The same 98% is reused on its GPTZero page. Its ToS disclaims any guarantee.

An AI humanizer can feel like a simple copypaste tool: you add a draft, press a button and get a more natural version back. From a privacy perspective, though, that paste box is a data intake form. Th

No Humbot vs Pangram test exists. Pangram called its output unreadable, graded it L3, and excluded L3 tools from all detection experiments. Humbot built-in checker omits Pangram.

No Phrasly vs Pangram test exists. Pangram rated Phrasly worst-tier and excluded it from detection experiments – and Phrasly’s own blog says Pangram catches exactly what humanizers do.

No published test of StealthWriter against Pangram exists. Pangram studied it, rated it L2 on writing quality, then excluded it from detection experiments – and now anonymises every tool it tests.

Pangram’s benchmark scores QuillBot 100.0% detected, joint-highest of 20 tools. QuillBot’s own FAQ disclaims detector bypass, and Pangram’s own paper files it as a paraphraser.