What to do when an AI detector flags you

SuperHumanizer has never mentioned Copyleaks and no detector company has tested it. So we audited the detector instead: eighteen citations, one misattributed to Cornell, and a resilience figure of 50%.

Undetectable AI never names ZeroGPT. But the peer-reviewed study it cites on its own detector page shows ZeroGPT falling from 95.03% to 32.31% once a paraphraser had been over the text.

SuperHumanizer names ZeroGPT as a detector it was built against, then never mentions it in any sales page. We trace all four numbers: 97%, 95%, 18.1% and a user who says it stopped passing.

Humbot claims its output passes GPTZero with no figure or screenshot. The one independent audit rates it worst of nineteen for sentences that are uninterpretable.

QuillBot’s own page says the Humanizer is not a tool for evading AI detection. GPTZero lists it as a bypass service anyway, and Pangram catches it 100% of the time.

Phrasly keeps a real versioned changelog. Every GPTZero entry in it is a repair after GPTZero caught its output, and there is no GPTZero pass rate anywhere.

StealthWriter’s website makes no detection claim at all. Its blog still hosts a GPTZero bypass tutorial, and that tutorial says typos did half the work.

Rephrasy guarantees 100% pass rates on every major detector, including in the markup it submits to Google. Section 7 of its own Terms declines to guarantee it.

Turnitin PeerMark is Turnitin’s peer review workflow for classes that already submit work through Turnitin. Instead of collecting drafts, assigning partners, chasing comments and matching feedback to

We audited nineteen published university misconduct procedures. Every one sets a deadline the student must meet, some as short as two days. Six set none at all for the institution to reach a decision.